Synkinesis
Facial Paralysis
Dominance of ipsilateral corticospinal pathway in congenital mirror movements. (1/9)
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the mechanism of congenital mirror movements. DESIGN: The triple stimulation technique (TST) and the silent period were used to investigate a patient with congenital mirror movements. The TST was used to calculate the ratio of ipsilateral to contralateral corticospinal tracts from the two hemispheres to the spinal motor neurones. RESULTS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation over unilateral M1 induced larger ipsilateral than contralateral motor evoked potentials on both sides. Only 9% of spinal motor neurones innervating the abductor digitorum minimi were excited by contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation, while 94% were excited by the ipsilateral M1 stimulation. The silent period was examined during mirror movements and with voluntary contraction of the right first dorsal interosseus mimicking mirror movements. Left M1 stimulation (through the crossed corticospinal tract) did not show any difference in silent period between the two conditions, while right M1 stimulation (through the uncrossed tract) caused a longer silent period during mirror movements than during voluntary contractions. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that mirror movements may be caused by a strong connection between ipsilateral M1 and the mirror movements conveyed through a dominant ipsilateral corticospinal pathway. (+info)Electromyographic analyses of global synkinesis in the paretic upper limb after stroke. (2/9)
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Global synkinesis (GS), or motor irradiation, is an involuntary movement associated with the coactivation of numerous muscles in one limb when the opposite limb is active. The electromyographic (EMG) patterns of people with stroke and people who were healthy were analyzed to characterize GS development in relation to joint involvement and to attempt to relate these findings to clinical observations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with stroke, divided into 2 groups with either greater levels of irradiation (SG, n = 10) or lesser levels of irradiation (SL, n = 10), and 20 subjects in a control group were studied. A dynamometer was used to provide resistance for voluntary isometric muscle contractions of the flexor muscle groups of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist. The summated and standardized net EMG amplitudes of 8 principal muscles of the unexercised (paretic) upper extremity were used to characterize intensity and spatial representation of GS. Clinical measurements included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FMA), Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (BI), and the stage on the Brunnstrom Stages of Motor Recovery Scale (BR). RESULTS: In the SG and control groups, a more substantial GS intensity was associated with muscle contractions of the flexor muscles of the opposite proximal joint than was the case for contractions of the flexor muscles of the distal joint, whereas such a gradient change was absent in the SL group. The corresponding spatial patterns of GS exhibited a predominant cross-excitation over the unexercised pectoralis major and extensor carpi radialis muscles in the control group, contrary to the enhanced activation of the brachioradialis and biceps brachii muscles noted in patients with stroke. The SG group had a better FMA score and a more satisfactory BR stage than did the SL group, and the 2 neurological scores were related to GS intensity for patients with stroke, depending on joint involvement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Intensity of GS provided an affiliation with motor deficits and a promising window for poststroke recovery mechanisms. (+info)Mirror movements in parkinsonism: evaluation of a new clinical sign. (3/9)
BACKGROUND: Mirror movements (MM) are not widely appreciated in parkinsonism and no report has evaluated this clinical sign in detail. OBJECTIVES: To define the parkinsonian clinical features associated with MM in patients with early, asymmetric parkinsonism. METHODS: Twenty seven patients with early Parkinson's disease were evaluated using a standardised videotaping protocol. MM were scored from blinded video assessment using a clinical scale that rates the amplitude, distribution, and proportion of mirroring in the less affected limb. Parkinsonian features were combined into axial and lateralised scores using related items of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. RESULTS: MM were present in 24 of 27 patients. There was a significant linear correlation between the degree of asymmetry of motor deficits and MM on the less affected side. The effect of asymmetry was greater when the proportional rather than the absolute motor difference between sides was largest. Asymmetry in leg rigidity was the most important examination feature in the prediction of contralateral foot mirroring. CONCLUSIONS: MM are a clinical feature of the unaffected or less affected side in mild asymmetric parkinsonism. Their presence may be a useful clinical finding in early parkinsonism. (+info)Interhemispheric interaction in the motor domain in children with cerebral palsy. (4/9)
(+info)Bilateral facial synkinesis in leprosy. (5/9)
(+info)Ipsilateral synkinesia involves the supplementary motor area. (6/9)
(+info)Kinematic and diffusion tensor imaging definition of familial Marcus Gunn jaw-winking synkinesis. (7/9)
(+info)Prioritizing genetic testing in patients with Kallmann syndrome using clinical phenotypes. (8/9)
(+info)Synkinesis is a medical term that refers to an involuntary and abnormal movement or contraction of one muscle group that occurs in conjunction with voluntary movement of another muscle group. This condition often arises as a result of nerve injury or regeneration, where the nerves that control facial movements become crossed, causing the muscles to move together unintentionally.
For example, when a person with synkinesis tries to smile, they may also involuntarily blink or raise their eyebrows. This can lead to functional impairments and cosmetic concerns, particularly in cases of facial nerve palsy or Bell's palsy. Treatment for synkinesis typically involves physical therapy, botulinum toxin (Botox) injections, or surgical intervention to help restore normal muscle function and movement.
Facial paralysis is a loss of facial movement due to damage or dysfunction of the facial nerve (cranial nerve VII). This nerve controls the muscles involved in facial expressions, such as smiling, frowning, and closing the eyes. Damage to one side of the facial nerve can cause weakness or paralysis on that side of the face.
Facial paralysis can result from various conditions, including:
1. Bell's palsy - an idiopathic (unknown cause) inflammation of the facial nerve
2. Trauma - skull fractures, facial injuries, or surgical trauma to the facial nerve
3. Infections - Lyme disease, herpes zoster (shingles), HIV/AIDS, or bacterial infections like meningitis
4. Tumors - benign or malignant growths that compress or invade the facial nerve
5. Stroke - damage to the brainstem where the facial nerve originates
6. Congenital conditions - some people are born with facial paralysis due to genetic factors or birth trauma
Symptoms of facial paralysis may include:
* Inability to move one or more parts of the face, such as the eyebrows, eyelids, mouth, or cheeks
* Drooping of the affected side of the face
* Difficulty closing the eye on the affected side
* Changes in saliva and tear production
* Altered sense of taste
* Pain around the ear or jaw
* Speech difficulties due to weakened facial muscles
Treatment for facial paralysis depends on the underlying cause. In some cases, such as Bell's palsy, spontaneous recovery may occur within a few weeks to months. However, physical therapy, medications, and surgical interventions might be necessary in other situations to improve function and minimize complications.